![]() |
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Photo via Presidential House.
|
|||
Published on
Thursday, October 3, 2024
By the A.M. Costa Rica staff
The
Constitutional Chamber (officially
designated as Sala IV), comprising 12
substitute magistrates from Costa Rica's
Supreme Court of Justice, examined the
document and concluded that the plan
includes unconstitutional clauses.
The
magistrates unanimously agreed that Jaguar
Plan clauses 4 and 5 are constitutionally
flawed and are against the current Constitution
of Costa Rica Law,
which is the body of law governing
the interpretation and implementation of
the country constitution.
The
magistrates found these parts unlawful,
even though the government made several
adjustments to the original plan, which
was also rejected by the Chamber in June.
The fourth clause of the Jaguar Plan aimed to reform the General Law of Government Agreements (Law Nº. 9986 Ley General de Contratación Pública), in the segment that regulates the purchase or leasing of real estate assets. The magistrates rejected the proposed amendment because it disobeyed the law.
---------------
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |